Gender Category and Gender Status: A Critical Distinction

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Gender has been of explicit analytical interest in sociology for decades. Despite its centrality to the field, “gender” eludes conceptual specificity in significant ways, such as lacking distinction between gender category (identification as a man, woman, nonbinary, etc.) and gender status (the state of being cisgender or not). I contend that the cisgender status is a rich site of interpersonal and institutional power that has been understudied. This work forwards the concepts of gender category and status as analytical tools to help explore key elements of gender interaction and structure, such as cisness. I argue cisness must be teased out via the express distinction between gender category and status, and I provide empirical evidence from 75 interviews with various gendered actors (i.e., cisgender men, cisgender women, transgender men, transgender women, nonbinary individuals) to demonstrate the applied purchase of my findings.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kolber, J. (2023). Gender Category and Gender Status: A Critical Distinction. Symbolic Interaction, 46(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.665

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free