Immunodiagnosis of filariasis

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the indirect haemagglutination (IHA) test and the counter-current immuno-electrophoresis test (CIEP) were assessed in the diagnosis of filariasis. Positive reactions were observed in 91% and 86% of cases by ELISA and IHA respectively. CIEP detected only 31.5% of cases. Cross-reaction due to intestinal nematodes was observed in 80% of cases by both ELISA and IHA whereas with CIEP cross-reaction was observed in 10% of cases. The microfilaria count was inversely proportional to the antibody titre among asymptomatic carriers. ELISA was the most sensitive test, followed by IHA and then CIEP. CIEP, though it detected only a small number of cases, was observed to be the most specific.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sengupta, G., Mohapatra, T. M., & Sen, P. C. (1986). Immunodiagnosis of filariasis. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 89(6), 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3508-8_25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free