Intravenous thrombolytic therapy in myocardial infarction: An analytical review

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The properties and physiological effects of three currently FDA‐approved thrombolytic agents, streptokinase (SK), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and anisoylated plasmminogen activator complex (APSAC) are reviewed. All thrombolytic agents have been shown to reduce mortality postmyocardial infarction (MI). Comparative trials have failed to demonstrate a difference between the effects of tPA, SK, and APSAC on mortality. In addition, no consistent difference between the three agents on ejection fraction (EF) has been found despite a superior reperfusion rate with tPA at 90 min. Further‐more, reinfarction and interventional procedure rates were significantly higher after thrombolytic treatment, and the incidence of total strokes was higher with tPA than SK in some comparative studies. Based on analysis of the published megatrials, SK is a more cost‐effective thrombolytic agent for patients with acute MI than tPA or APSAC. Copyright © 1993 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shammas, N. W., Fitzpatrick, P., & Zeitler, R. (1993). Intravenous thrombolytic therapy in myocardial infarction: An analytical review. Clinical Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960160402

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free