Is the estimation of measurement uncertainty a viable alternative to validation?

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two examples of the use of measurement uncertainty in a development environment are presented and compared to the use of validation. It is concluded that measurement uncertainty is a good alternative to validation for chemical processes in the development stage. Some advantages of measurement uncertainty are described. The major advantages are that the estimations of measurement uncertainty are very efficient, and can be performed before analysis of the samples. The results of measurement uncertainty influence the type of analysis employed in the development process, and the measurement design can be adjusted to the need of the process. © 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Küppers, S. (2005). Is the estimation of measurement uncertainty a viable alternative to validation? In Validation in Chemical Measurement (pp. 76–79). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27034-5_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free