Time for a Rethink

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The translocal perspective is not yet fully established in social science. As an analytical perspective, translocality represents an alternative to some dominant approaches. In this chapter, we demonstrate the need for a change in perspective by highlighting the conceptual pitfalls of conventional approaches in migration studies and development research and practice. First, we take a critical look at previous research on the relationship between migration and development (Sect. 2.1), exploring how interdisciplinary research on this nexus has long been caught in two methodological traps: an “ideological trap” and a “territorial trap”. We then examine conventional urban/rural thinking in development research and cooperation (Sect. 2.2), showing that the container-spatial bias of this dichotomizing view can lead to some grave misconceptions of rural and urban development. From the analytical limitations of the traditional views, we derive the need for a rethink and introduce the idea of translocal livelihoods as a conceptual link between migration research and development studies (Sect. 2.3).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steinbrink, M., & Niedenführ, H. (2020). Time for a Rethink. In Springer Geography (pp. 9–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22841-5_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free