Experimental investigation of air side pressure loss for wet-cooling tower fills

8Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The pressure loss of air-flow in the cooling tower was measured experimentally with three different type cooling tower fill materials. Air mass flux (3.13 < Ga, < 5.21 kg/m2s), water mass flux (2.43 < Gw, < 5.21 kg/m2s) and height of the fill material (0.6, 0.8, and 1 m) were used as variable parameters for experimental works. Film, curler and splash type fillings were tested in the forced draft counter flow cooling tower unit which has 0.4 x 0.4 m2 cross-section area. Experimental results were presented graphically. However, these results correlated for each type cooling tower fill material. The pressure loss was increased with increasing air mass flux. The pressure loss of film type filling is 29.1% higher than splash type.

References Powered by Scopus

A comprehensive approach to cooling tower design

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Investigation of cooling tower packing in various arrangements

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Loss coefficient correlation for wet-cooling tower fills

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Numerical study regarding cooling capacity for non-equidistant fillings in large-scale wet cooling towers

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Influence of packing configuration and flow rate on the performance of a forced draft wet cooling tower

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF WET COOLING TOWER WITH SPLASH FILLS PACKING

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ozgur, A. E., & Bayrakci, H. C. (2020). Experimental investigation of air side pressure loss for wet-cooling tower fills. Thermal Science, 24, 2047–2053. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI180709317O

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free