Mutant‑allele fraction heterogeneity is associated with non‑small cell lung cancer patient survival

13Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Genetic intratumor heterogeneity is associated with tumor occurrence, development and overall outcome. The present study aims to explore the association between mutant-allele fraction (MAF) heterogeneity and patient overall survival in lung cancer. Somatic mutation data of 939 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Entropy-based mutation allele fraction (EMAF) score was used to describe the uncertainty of individual somatic mutation patterns and to further analyze the association with patient overall survival. Results indicated that association between EMAF and overall survival was significant in the discovery set [hazard ratio (H)R=1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08‑2.41; P=0.018] and replication set (HR=1.63; 95% CI: 1.11‑2.37; P=0.011). In addition, EMAF was also significantly different in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, a significant difference was indicated in early-stage patients. Results from c-index analysis indicated that EMAF improved the model predictive performance on the 3-year survival beyond that of traditional clinical staging, particularly in early‑stage patients. In conclusion, EMAF successfully reflected MAF heterogeneityamong patients with NSCLC. Additionally, EMAF improved the predictive performance in early-stage patient prognosis beyond that of traditional clinical staging. In clinical application, EMAF appears to identify a subset of early-stage patients with a poor prognosis and therefore may help inform clinical decisions regarding the application of chemotherapy after surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shen, S., Wei, Y., Zhang, R., Du, M., Duan, W., Yang, S., … Chen, F. (2018). Mutant‑allele fraction heterogeneity is associated with non‑small cell lung cancer patient survival. Oncology Letters, 15(1), 795–802. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7428

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free