Influence of alveolar ventilation changes on calculated gastric intramucosal pH and gastric-arterial PCO2 difference

20Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of changes in alveolar ventilation on the following tonometry-derived variables: gastric intramucosal CO2 tension (PtCO2), gastric arterial CO2 tension difference (P(gap)CO2), gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) and arterial pH-pHi difference (pH(gap)). Design: Clinical prospective study. Setting: A medical intensive care unit in a university hospital. Patients: Ten critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients requiring hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheter. Interventions: Gastric tonometer placement. A progressive increase in tidal volume (V(T)) from 7 to 10 ml/ kg followed by an abrupt return to baseline V(T) level. Measurements and main results: Tonometer saline PtCO2 and hemodynamic data were collected hourly at various V(T) levels: HO and HO' (baseline V(T) = 7 ml/kg), H1 (V(T) = a ml/kg), H2 (V(T) = 9 ml/kg): H3 (V(T) = 10 ml/kg), H4 (baseline V(T)). During the 'hyperventilation phase' (H0-H3), pHi (p < 0.01) and pH(gap) (p < 0.05) increased but P(gap)- CO2 remained unchanged. Cardiac output (CO) was not affected by ventilatory change. During the 'hypoventilation phase' (H3-H4), pHi fell from 7.27 ± O.11 to 7.23 ± 0.09 (p < 0.01) and P(gap)CO2 decreased from 16 ± 5 mmHg to 13 ± 4 mmHg (p < 0.05). V(T) reduction was associated with a significant cardiac out put elevation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: PaCO2 and PtCO2 are similarly influenced by the changes in alveolar ventilation. Unlike pHi, the P(gap)CO2 is not affected by ventilation variations unless CO changes are associated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernardin, G., Lucas, P., Hyvernat, H., Deloffre, P., & Mattéi, M. (1999). Influence of alveolar ventilation changes on calculated gastric intramucosal pH and gastric-arterial PCO2 difference. Intensive Care Medicine, 25(3), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050834

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free