Power, knowledge, morals: Society in the age of hybrid research

4Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, I will try to discuss what specific practices, intrinsic value bases, and spheres of competence should ideally characterize three of the most important and interrelated, but yet separate collective arenas or systems of authority that, in my view, still constitute the “necessities permanents” in modern liberal-democratic society: politics, systematic research or science, and public administration. I will further argue that precisely by strictly upholding and respecting their respective and specific normative systems and institutional practices, their separate and joint contributions to society will become optimal. I will also, at least, briefly touch upon the role played by modern media as a fundamentally new type of arena of authority in western democratic society and particularly what I consider to be its distorting impact on the existing, traditionally, democratically based systems of authority and power.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nybom, T. (2013). Power, knowledge, morals: Society in the age of hybrid research. In Higher Education Dynamics (Vol. 39, pp. 21–37). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5249-8_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free