Use of calorie information at fast food and chain restaurants among US youth aged 9-18 years, 2010

11Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BackgroundTo examine whether youth use calorie information when it is available at fast food/chain restaurants and what factors are associated with using this information to make their food selection.MethodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted on a sample of 721 youth (9-18 years) using the 2010 YouthStyles and HealthStyles surveys. The outcome measure was reported use of calorie information at fast food/chain restaurants. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the associations between sociodemographic variables and the use of calorie information at fast food/chain restaurants.ResultsOf those who visited fast food/chain restaurants, 42.4% reported using calorie information at least sometimes. Girls were more likely than boys (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-2.5) and youth who were obese were more likely than those at a healthy weight (aOR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.04-2.9) to use calorie information, and youth eating at a fast food/chain restaurant twice a week or more versus once a week or less were half as likely to report using calorie information (aOR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.4-0.8).ConclusionPublic health education efforts can benefit from research to determine how to increase usage among youth so that their food choices are appropriate for their caloric needs.© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

65Citations
147Readers
31Citations
111Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wethington, H., Maynard, L. M., & Blanck, H. M. (2013). Use of calorie information at fast food and chain restaurants among US youth aged 9-18 years, 2010. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 35(3), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdt049

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

73%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

11%

Researcher 4

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

41%

Social Sciences 10

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

21%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0