The relationship between lifestyle and self-reported oral health among American adults

29Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives Whereas an unhealthy lifestyle is a risk factor for chronic disease, its relationship to self-reported oral health is unclear. This paper studies this relationship among American adults using two dimensions of self-reported oral health, namely: (1) the extent to which a person's teeth are in poor condition, simply called 'bad teeth'; (2) the occurrences of negative consequences of poor oral health, simply called 'bad experience'. The main purpose of this study is to describe and assess their relationship to four markers of lifestyles and to use the results to make recommendations on improving oral health. Methods Data were obtained from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2006. A series of logistic regression models quantified the associations between lifestyle markers with self-reported oral health. Results Our major findings are that: (1) individuals who smoked every day were significantly more likely to have bad teeth and a bad oral experience than non-smokers, with risk ratios of 1.61 (95% CI 1.36, 1.92) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.24, 1.8), respectively; (2) individuals who had poor diets were more likely to report bad teeth and have bad oral experiences than those who had excellent diets, with risk ratios of 4.22 (95% CI 2.8, 6.28) and 2.88 (95% CI 1.83, 4.55), respectively, both comparisons adjusted for other demographic variables. Conclusions These results suggest that self-reported indicators of oral health could be used to guide people in making improvements in their life style that could result in better oral health, especially for disadvantaged individuals. © 2013 FDI World Dental Federation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, Y. (2014). The relationship between lifestyle and self-reported oral health among American adults. International Dental Journal, 64(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12061

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free