A public management perspective on smart cities: ‘Urban auditing’ for management, governance and accountability

63Citations
Citations of this article
186Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Our exploration of three bodies of literature–public management, accounting and urban governance–shows that three views on these new technological practices of ‘urban auditing’ are present in the literature: a technocratic, a critical and an emergent view. We use these three views to introduce the six papers in this special issue. We conclude with the observation that the public management perspective is important for understanding smart city dynamics: we should not present our insights only in our own community, but should also connect to the interdisciplinary debate on smart cities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grossi, G., Meijer, A., & Sargiacomo, M. (2020, May 3). A public management perspective on smart cities: ‘Urban auditing’ for management, governance and accountability. Public Management Review. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1733056

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free