Relative kinetics of phenylalanine and leucine in low birth weight infants during nutrient administration

39Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The effect of the route of nutrient administration on the relative rates of leucine and phenylalanine kinetics was examined in 30 low birth weight (LBW) infants using L-[1-13C]leucine, L-[2H5]phenylalanine, and L- [2H2]tyrosine tracers. The infants received special premature formula (PF, n = 10, 117 ± 8 kcal · kg-1 · d-1 and 3.2 ± 0.2 g protein · kg-1 · d-1) or fortified human milk (HM, n = 10, 106 ± 6 kcal · kg-1 · d-1 and 3.0 ± 0.2 g protein · kg-1 · d-1), or parenteral nutrition (PN, n = 10, 80 ± 25 kcal · kg-1 · d-1 and 1.8 ± 0.3 g protein · kg-1 · d-1). The rate of appearance (Ra) of leucine (Rd(Leu)), was significantly higher in group PF as compared with group PF (94 ± 18 versus 115 ± 16, p < 0.05), Ra(Phe) in group PN (108 ± 24 μmol · kg-1 · h-1) was in between group PF and HM. The relative rate of Ra(Phe) and Ra(Leu) expressed as Ra(Phe)/Ra(Leu) ratio was lower in all groups than that expected from reported whole body protein composition and from that reported in adults. The ratio of phenylalanine hydroxylation to leucine decarboxylation was 0.202 in group PF, 0.212 in group HM, and 0.161 in group PN, suggesting a higher rate of decarboxylation of leucine relative to hydroxylation of phenylalanine. We conclude that: 1) the higher Ra(Leu) compared with the Ra(Phe), may be the result of either a higher turnover of a body protein enriched in leucine or the consequence of higher leucine intake in infant nutrition and 2) whole body protein kinetics calculated from a single amino acid tracer do not adequately represent whole body protein metabolism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Toledo-Eppinga, L., Kalhan, S. C., Kulik, W., Jakobs, C., & Lafeber, H. N. (1996). Relative kinetics of phenylalanine and leucine in low birth weight infants during nutrient administration. Pediatric Research, 40(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199607000-00008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free