Comparision Between Models Used to Simulate Dam-Break Flows over a Mobile Bed Made of Different Materials

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The hydrodynamic and morphodynamic processes are very important aspects in the study of dam break flow over the mobile bed. It is possible to simulate and thus to forecast the water and sediment movements thanks to appropriate models. The hydrodynamics is well represented by the Saint–Venant shallow water equations that constitute a simple hyperbolic system and for which different numerical models exist. The inclusion of the morphodynamics introduces additional difficulties, so different solutions have been developed in order to better represent the movement of sediments and the associated changes in the morphology. Several models with different approaches have been developed and are available in the literature: (i) the clear water layer model, representing one layer of clear water flowing over a mobile sediment bed; (ii) the mixture layer model, considering one layer of a variable density mixture of sediment and water; (iii) the two-layer model, which distinguishes the upper clear water layer from the lower moving sediment layer, where the bed-load transport takes place and (iv) the two-phase model, which considers the water and the sediments as two immiscible phases characterized by different velocities. This paper aims at assessing the performances of these models using two different test cases of dam-break flow over the mobile bed, for which experimental data exist. The results from the different models are compared to data measured in dam-break flow experiments over mobile bed composed by (i) coarse sand for the first case and (ii) light PVC pellets for the second case.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fent, I., Van Emelen, S., & Soares-Frazão, S. (2018). Comparision Between Models Used to Simulate Dam-Break Flows over a Mobile Bed Made of Different Materials. In Springer Water (pp. 1133–1147). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7218-5_78

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free