A note on the comparison of mixed-effects models for longitudinal studies

  • Szabelska-Beręsewicz A
  • Bilska A
  • Waszkowiak K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper concerns methods of choosing appropriate models for longitudinal studies. Attention is paid to three criteria: the marginal Akaike Information Criterion (mAIC), the conditional Akaike Information Criterion (cAIC), and the corrected conditional Akaike Information Criterion (ccAIC). We consider these criteria based on an example concerning the effect of storage time and addition of flaxseed ( Linum usitatissimum L.) preparations (i.e. ground flaxseeds, defatted flaxseed meal and flaxseed ethanolic extract) on changes in lipid oxidation and fatty acid composition during the storage of liver pâté with partial substitution of fat with flax oil.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szabelska-Beręsewicz, A., Bilska, A., Waszkowiak, K., & Siatkowski, I. (2016). A note on the comparison of mixed-effects models for longitudinal studies. Biometrical Letters, 53(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1515/bile-2016-0012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free