Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous studies using binocular rivalry have shown that signals in a modality other than the visual can bias dominance durations depending on their congruency with the rivaling stimuli. More recently, studies using continuous flash suppression (CFS) have reported that multisensory integration influences how long visual stimuli remain suppressed. In this study, using CFS, we examined whether the contrast thresholds for detecting visual looming stimuli are influenced by a congruent auditory stimulus. In Experiment 1, we show that a looming visual stimulus can result in lower detection thresholds compared to a static concentric grating, but that auditory tone pips congruent with the looming stimulus did not lower suppression thresholds any further. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, we again observed no advantage for congruent multisensory stimuli. These results add to our understanding of the conditions under which multisensory integration is possible, and suggest that certain forms of multisensory integration are not evident when the visual stimulus is suppressed from awareness using CFS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moors, P., Huygelier, H., Wagemans, J., De-Wit, L., & Van Ee, R. (2015). Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression. I-Perception, 6(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0678

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free