Reliability of rubidium-82 PET/CT for renal perfusion determination in healthy subjects

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Changes in renal perfusion may play a pathophysiological role in hypertension and kidney disease, however to date, no method for renal blood flow (RBF) determination in humans has been implemented in clinical practice. In a previous study, we demonstrated that estimation of renal perfusion based on a single positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan with Rubidium-82 (82Rb) is feasible and found an approximate 5% intra-assay coefficient of variation for both kidneys, indicative of a precise method.This study’s aim was to determine the day-to day variation of 82Rb PET/CT and to test the method’s ability to detect increased RBF induced by infusion of amino acids. Methods: Seventeen healthy subjects underwent three dynamic 82Rb PET/CT scans over two examination days comprising: Day A, a single 8-minute dynamic scan and Day B, two scans performed before (baseline) and after RBF stimulation by a 2-hour amino acid-infusion. The order of examination days was determined by randomization. Time activity curves for arterial and renal activity with a 1-tissue compartment model were used for flow estimation; the K1 kinetic parameter representing renal 82Rb clearance. Day-to-day variation was calculated based on the difference between the unstimulated K1 values on Day A and Day B and paired t-testing was performed to compare K1 values at baseline and after RBF stimulation on Day B. Results: Day-to-day variation was observed to be 5.5% for the right kidney and 6.0% for the left kidney (n = 15 quality accepted scans). K1 values determined after amino acid-infusion were significantly higher than pre-infusion values (n = 17, p = 0.001). The mean percentage change in K1 from baseline was 13.2 ± 12.9% (range − 10.4 to 35.5) for the right kidney; 12.9 ± 13.2% (range − 15.7 to 35.3) for the left kidney. Conclusion: Day-to-day variation is acceptably low. A significant K1 increase from baseline is detected after application of a known RBF stimulus, indicating that 82Rb PET/CT scanning can provide a precise method for evaluation of RBF and it is able to determine changes herein. Clinical Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials Register, 2017-005008-88. Registered 18/01/2018.

References Powered by Scopus

Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia

479Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with <sup>82</sup>Rb PET: Comparison with <sup>13</sup>N-ammonia PET

232Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Circadian rhythm of glomerular filtration rate in normal individuals

227Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

First-time rest-stress dynamic whole-body <sup>82</sup>Rb-PET imaging using a long axial field-of-view PET/CT scanner

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease and Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease: Protocol for 3 Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials (SiRENA Project)

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Renal clearance estimated by rubidium-82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography and technetium-99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine clearance infusion technique

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Langaa, S. S., Mose, F. H., Fynbo, C. A., Theil, J., & Bech, J. N. (2022). Reliability of rubidium-82 PET/CT for renal perfusion determination in healthy subjects. BMC Nephrology, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02962-w

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

60%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

13%

Engineering 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free