Management of cytomegalovirus infection by weekly surveillance after renal transplant: Analysis of cost, rejection and renal function

32Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Recently published guidelines recommend anti-viral prophylaxis as the best method of preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in the posttransplant period, but some authors have suggested that surveillance strategies may be as effective and less costly. The aim of the present study was to analyse the effectiveness and cost of a deferred treatment strategy using weekly CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) surveillance in high risk renal transplant recipients. Methods. We used weekly surveillance for plasma CMV PCR positivity for the first 3 months in consecutive renal transplants between CMV seropositive donors and seronegative recipients, and analysed incidence of CMV infection, timing of infection, acute rejection and renal function at 1 year. Results. There was evidence of CMV infection in 27/41 (65.9%) patients and of CMV disease in 20/41 (48.8%). Only 8/20 (40%) patients were PCR positive before disease onset. Patients were treated on the basis of clinical evidence of CMV disease (deferred strategy), but we used the data to compare the potential costs of a pre-emptive strategy (all patients PCR positive before the onset of clinical features of disease treated with intravenous ganciclovir) and prophylaxis (oral ganciclovir for 3 months in all patients). The deferred strategy cost £1159 per patient (excluding the cost of hospitalization) while a pre-emptive strategy would cost £1381 per patient. Prophylaxis costs £1500-£2213 per patient depending on published estimates of relative risk reduction. Mean estimated creatinine clearance at 1 year was 70.0 ml/min in patients who experienced no infection, 47.7 ml/min in patients who experienced infection but no disease, and 39.6 ml/min in patients who experienced CMV disease (P < 0.001). The incidence of acute rejection in these groups was 7.1, 14.3 and 35%, respectively (P = 0.13). Conclusions. CMV surveillance strategies may cost slightly less but may have a deleterious effect on longterm outcome compared with prophylaxis.

References Powered by Scopus

Valacyclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation

679Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Monocytes are a major site of persistence of human cytomegalovirus in peripheral blood mononuclear cells

624Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emergence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease among recipients of solid-organ transplants

473Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Prophylactic versus preemptive oral valganciclovir for the management of cytomegalovirus infection in adult renal transplant recipients

315Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cytomegalovirus in transplantation - Challenging the status quo

251Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Viral infection in the renal transplant recipient

198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geddes, C. C., Church, C. C., Collidge, T., McCruden, E. A. B., Gillespie, G., Matthews, E., … Briggs, J. D. (2003). Management of cytomegalovirus infection by weekly surveillance after renal transplant: Analysis of cost, rejection and renal function. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 18(9), 1891–1898. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfg283

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

50%

Researcher 4

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

64%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

21%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Physics and Astronomy 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free