Differential responses of avian and mammalian predators to phenotypic variation in Australian Brood Frogs

8Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Anti-predator signaling is highly variable with numerous examples of species employing cryptic coloration to avoid detection or conspicuous coloration (often coupled with a secondary defense) to ensure detection and recollection. While the ends of this spectrum are clear in their function, how species use intermediate signals is less clear. Australian Brood Frogs (Pseudophryne) display conspicuous coloration on both their dorsum and venter. Coupled with the alkaloid toxins these frogs possess, this coloration may be aposematic, providing a protective warning signal to predators. We assessed predation rates of known and novel color patterns and found no difference for avian or mammalian predators. However, when Pseudophryne dorsal phenotypes were collectively compared to the high-contrast ventral phenotype of this genus, we found birds, but not mammals, attacked dorsal phenotypes significantly less frequently than the ventral phenotype. This study, importantly, shows a differential predator response to ventral coloration in this genus which has implications for the evolution of conspicuous signaling in Pseudophryne.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lawrence, J. P., Mahony, M., & Noonan, B. P. (2018). Differential responses of avian and mammalian predators to phenotypic variation in Australian Brood Frogs. PLoS ONE, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195446

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free