On the Volume of Redistribution: Across Income Levels and Across Groups

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The optimal income taxation literature focuses on the tradeoff between the equity gains of higher progressivity versus its greater incentive costs at the individual level. This paper highlights a neglected aspect of redistribution—greater progressivity requires a higher volume of gross redistributive flows, across income levels. If these flows are costly to manage, administratively, or politically, then progressivity will be lower. Moreover, if redistribution across income levels implies redistribution across sociopolitically salient groups because of the way in which these groups line up relative to the income distribution, this can be an added cost in the objective function and progressivity is further disadvantaged. The paper develops a simple framework in which these questions can be addressed. Among the many interesting results is that when the capacity for the volume of redistributive flows, across income levels or across sociopolitical groups, is reached, an increase in market inequality can lead to a fall in progressivity in the tax-transfer regime without any change in the government’s preferences for equity. A focus on the volume of redistribution thus opens up an important set of theoretical and empirical questions for analysis and for policy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kanbur, R. (2019). On the Volume of Redistribution: Across Income Levels and Across Groups. In Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being (pp. 53–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7944-4_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free