Jurisdiction, inscription, and state formation: Administrative modernism and knowledge regimes

29Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In seventeenth-century France, Colbert built a more effective state administration not by rationalizing state offices but by using public documents to increase the government's intellectual capacity to exercise logistical power and engage in territorial governance. This pattern calls into question Weber's model of the genesis of "modern officialdom," suggesting that its source was not social rationalization, but rather the identification and management of expertise. Colbert recruited into government nascent technocrats with knowledge useful to territorial politics, using contracts and other documents to limit their independence and subordinate them to patrimonial authorities. They exercised specific duties and impersonal powers in jurisdictional areas-much like modern technocrats. Their expertise enhanced the intellectual capacity of the administration to exercise territorial power and made the state less dependent on patrimonial clienteles without challenging the patrimonial culture of power/knowledge. © 2011 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mukerji, C. (2011). Jurisdiction, inscription, and state formation: Administrative modernism and knowledge regimes. Theory and Society, 40(3), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9141-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free