Conflict of interest in psychiatry

19Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims and method: To study the association between study support and outcome in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotropic drugs, we reviewed all RCTs published in four psychiatry journals over a 5-year period. Chi-squared tests were used to analyse the association between RCT support and outcome, and logistic regression to determine which variable best predicted outcome. Results: A significantly higher proportion of manufacturer-supported RCTs (125/138, 91%, 95% CI 88-93) had a positive outcome than nonmanufacturer-supported RCTs (39/50, 78%, 95% CI 72-84; P=0.02). Having an employee author almost guaranteed a positive outcome (56/58, 97%, 95% CI 94-99). Clinical implications: Outcomes of drug RCTs have a significant association with support by the manufacturer of the experimental drug. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on these RCTs may be biased in favour of newer drugs.

References Powered by Scopus

Withholding research results in academic life science: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty

480Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology

385Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials

303Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

3857Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Industry sponsorship and research outcome

1033Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Industry sponsorship and research outcome (Review)

559Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmer, S., Arya, P., Anderson, D., & Faruqui, R. (2005, August). Conflict of interest in psychiatry. Psychiatric Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.29.8.302

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

40%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

20%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Engineering 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free