Conflict of interest in psychiatry

19Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims and method: To study the association between study support and outcome in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotropic drugs, we reviewed all RCTs published in four psychiatry journals over a 5-year period. Chi-squared tests were used to analyse the association between RCT support and outcome, and logistic regression to determine which variable best predicted outcome. Results: A significantly higher proportion of manufacturer-supported RCTs (125/138, 91%, 95% CI 88-93) had a positive outcome than nonmanufacturer-supported RCTs (39/50, 78%, 95% CI 72-84; P=0.02). Having an employee author almost guaranteed a positive outcome (56/58, 97%, 95% CI 94-99). Clinical implications: Outcomes of drug RCTs have a significant association with support by the manufacturer of the experimental drug. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on these RCTs may be biased in favour of newer drugs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmer, S., Arya, P., Anderson, D., & Faruqui, R. (2005, August). Conflict of interest in psychiatry. Psychiatric Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.29.8.302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free