Phone Surveys: Introductions and response rates

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As web surveys increase in popularity, the focus in the research industry on telephone surveys continues to decline. However, phone surveys are far from becoming extinct. Limited Internet access among certain populations (including older and lower income groups) makes telephone a preferred methodology when broad cross-sections of a population need to be reached, such as in the health research arena, where large-scale surveys such as the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFS), California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), and the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) rely on telephone surveys. An understudied but critical component of phone surveys is the introduction. Introductions that are effective at convincing sample members to participate can help to improve shrinking response rates in this mode. These declining response rates have the potential to contribute to nonresponse error, and interviewers contribute differentially to nonresponse. Why do some telephone interviewers have better response rates than others? What are key speech and vocal characteristics of interviewers that help their performance, and how can these characteristics be implemented in practice? This chapter will review existing literature on telephone survey introductions, examine components of an ideal introduction, and conclude with suggestions for effective interviewer training in this area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Broome, J. (2019). Phone Surveys: Introductions and response rates. In Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (pp. 1417–1430). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free