Rates of presurgical underestimation of breast cancer after standardized assessment of breast calcifications

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the frequency of histopathological underestimation of breast cancer after vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in standardized assessment of breast calcifications compared to postsurgical diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study included acquired data of 506 consecutively examined women, who underwent VAB for the assessment of pure calcifications after standardized digital mammographic and sonographic imaging. 119/506 (24.5 %) women underwent further surgical procedures: 37 women had a surgical diagnostic excision biopsy, 82 women a surgical procedure based on a therapeutic concept. Presurgical results of VAB were compared with the postsurgical histopathological reports. Results: In 91/119 women (76.5 %) the final histology was malignant. The rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was 79.1 % (72/91) and the rate of invasive carcinoma was 20.9 % (19/91). In 9/37 women with diagnostic excision biopsy, the presurgical status of benign or uncertain changed to a postsurgical diagnosis of malignant (24.3 %). In eight cases underestimation included DCIS (21.6 %) and in one case invasive cancer (2.7 %). Seven of the nine underestimated cases (77.8 %) resulted from excision biopsy of atypical epithelial proliferation of ductal type (AEPDT, positive predictive value 30.4 % (7/23)). After surgery due to DCIS in 7/71 women invasive breast cancer was diagnosed (9.9 %). In 11/82 women with oncological surgery, invasive cancer was already diagnosed by VAB. Conclusion: Underestimation of invasive cancer in terms of presurgical DCIS diagnosis can be minimized by the standardized assessment protocol to about 10 %. Underestimation of DCIS is mainly related to presurgical diagnosis of AEPDT. Key Points: • The standardized use of digital mammographic and sonographic imaging prior to vacuum-assisted biopsy is suitable for minimizing underestimation of invasive breast cancer. AEPDT represents a high risk diagnosis for underestimation of DCIS. Citation Format: • Timpe L., Berkemeyer S., Puesken M. et al. Rates of Presurgical Underestimation of Breast Cancer after Standardized Assessment of Breast Calcifications. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2015; 187: 445 - 449.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Timpe, L., Berkemeyer, S., Puesken, M., Tio, J., Heindel, W., & Weigel, S. (2015). Rates of presurgical underestimation of breast cancer after standardized assessment of breast calcifications. RoFo Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren, 187(6), 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1399273

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free