Objective: Plaut’s breakthrough 2010 publication on diversity science—the study of meaningful human differences—set in motion a generative field of theory and research. Yet, to move diversity science forward, innovative methods that explicitly center the experiences of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) who encounter multiple forms of marginalization must be adopted. One such approach is intersectional mixed methods research—a methodological approach that uses intersectionality theory to guide the use of both quantitative and qualitative methods within a single study. Conclusions: We argue that intersectional mixed methods research includes four tenets: (1) research questions prioritizemultiply marginalized BIPOC individuals, (2) the multiple realities of BIPOC individuals are honored and embraced, (3) identity-related variables (e.g., selfreported discrimination) are studied alongside systems-level variables (e.g., structural racism), and (4) scholars engage in critical reflexivity. We also propose that intersectional mixed methods research can advance scholarship on multiply marginalized BIPOC individuals by fulfilling one of five purposes: Triangulation, complementarity, expansion, development, and initiation. We close with a discussion of tensions and recommendations.
CITATION STYLE
Watson-Singleton, N. N., Lewis, J. A., & Dworkin, E. R. (2021). Toward a Socially Just Diversity Science: Using Intersectional Mixed Methods Research to Center Multiply Marginalized Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC). Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 29(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000477
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.