The extended (Evolutionary) synthesis debate: Where science meets philosophy

25Citations
Citations of this article
168Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent debates between proponents of the modern evolutionary synthesis (the standard model in evolutionary biology) and those of a possible extended synthesis are a good example of the fascinating tangle among empirical, theoretical, and conceptual or philosophical matters that is the practice of evolutionary biology. In this essay, we briefly discuss two case studies from this debate, highlighting the relevance of philosophical thinking to evolutionary biologists in the hope of spurring further constructive cross-pollination between the two fields. © The Author(s) 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pigliucci, M., & Finkelman, L. (2014). The extended (Evolutionary) synthesis debate: Where science meets philosophy. BioScience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free