Witch Hunts? Electoral Cycles and Corruption Lawsuits in Argentina

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Courts prosecuting corruption serve a critical horizontal accountability function, but they can also play a role in moments of vertical accountability when voters can sanction corrupt candidates. This article documents the strategic use of corruption lawsuits, demonstrating the presence of an electoral cycle in filing new corruption accusations against politicians. Using an original dataset of daily corruption complaints filed in federal courts against members of Argentina's main political coalitions between 2013 and 2021, we document increased corruption accusations against and by politicians in the periods immediately preceding an election. A second dataset of daily media coverage of corruption accusations in two leading newspapers suggests that corruption is more salient before elections, offering politicians a temporal focal point to prepare and launch especially impactful lawsuits. Our findings shed new light on using courts for accountability and debates about the so-called 'lawfare' in Latin America.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feierherd, G., Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., & Tuñón, G. (2024). Witch Hunts? Electoral Cycles and Corruption Lawsuits in Argentina. British Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712342300042X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free