Everyday Encounters with Art: Comparing Expert and Novice Experiences

  • Foreman‐Wernet L
  • Dervin B
7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The study reported here looked at how two groups of people – one with art expertise and one without – made sense of their encounters with an exhibition of a single artist, the late Paul‐Henri Bourguignon. The study builds on previous research using Dervin's Sense‐Making Methodology to study how people interpret their arts experiences within the contexts of their everyday lives. Informants were asked to rank‐order their selections among the pieces on display according to which had the most impact for them (however they defined impact). Each informant then did a structured qualitative interview focusing on the work he or she chose as most impactful. The researchers looked at thematic elements and other patterns of similarity and difference that arose in the interviews and offer thoughts on how the results of this study may provide insight to those who work in museums.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foreman‐Wernet, L., & Dervin, B. (2016). Everyday Encounters with Art: Comparing Expert and Novice Experiences. Curator: The Museum Journal, 59(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free