Efficacy and safety of dual-polymer hydroxypropyl guar-and hyaluronic acid-containing lubricant eyedrops for the management of dry-eye disease: A randomized double-masked clinical study

21Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: An artificial-tear formulation containing the dual polymers hydroxypropyl guar (HPG) and hyaluronic acid (HA) is approved for the treatment of dry-eye disease (DED). The present study compared the efficacy and safety of the HPG-HA dual-polymer formulation vs a sodium hyaluronate (SH)-containing artificial-tear formulation in patients with DED. Methods: In a prospective, 6-week, multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group study, patients with DED aged ≥18 years and total ocular surface staining (TOSS) score ≥4 and ≤9 were randomized (1:1) to receive either HPG-HA or SH four times a day for 42 days. Changes from baseline in TOSS (primary end point), impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) treatment-satisfaction scores (effectiveness and inconvenience), and tear-film breakup time (TFBUT) at day 42 were assessed using a fixed-sequence testing strategy. Noninferiority was assessed on the primary end point based on the upper limit of two-sided 95% CIs for mean treatment difference (HPG-HA or SH) <2 units. Results: In total, 99 patients were randomized (HPG-HA, n= 50; SH, n= 49). At day 42, the least square (LS) mean ± SE change from baseline in TOSS was-1.16±0.24 and-0.92±0.23 in the HPG-HA and SH groups, respectively, and the treatment difference was-0.24±0.33 (95% CI-0.90 to 0.42). Noninferiority was demonstrated as the upper limit of the 95% CI was <2 units. LS mean change from baseline at day 42 for HPG-HA vs SH was −3.18 (P=0.4817) in IDEEL treatment-effectiveness scores, −12.56 (P=0.0001) in treatment-inconvenience scores, and 0.30 seconds (P=0.5789) in TFBUT. Conclusion: The HPG-HA dual-polymer formulation was noninferior to the SH lubricant eyedrops for improvement in ocular surface staining in DED. HPG-HA did not show improvement over SH in IDEEL treatment-satisfaction scores. No new safety findings were reported.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Labetoulle, M., Schmickler, S., Galarreta, D., Böhringer, D., Ogundele, A., Guillon, M., & Baudouin, C. (2018). Efficacy and safety of dual-polymer hydroxypropyl guar-and hyaluronic acid-containing lubricant eyedrops for the management of dry-eye disease: A randomized double-masked clinical study. Clinical Ophthalmology, 12, 2499–2508. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S177176

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free