Repeated interviews about repeated trauma from the distant past: A study of report consistency

10Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Testing our beliefs about memory for crimes with participants who have memories for crimes is an essential component of research that is meant to be applied outside of the laboratory (e.g., Yuille, Ternes, & Cooper, 2010). This is a challenge, not just because it is difficult to locate and recruit participants with memories for crimes, but because the research is messy: often there is no control group, base truth is not known, and random assignment is impossible (see Paz-Alonso, Ogle, & Goodman, this volume). Notwithstanding these difficulties, applied work is essential if we are to have an impact (see Yuille, present volume). In this spirit, we describe a study in which a woman who reported having been a victim of five armed bank robberies in Montreal, Canada in the 1970s and who recalled the experiences on three separate occasions. First, we explain why this work was undertaken.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Connolly, D. A., & Price, H. L. (2013). Repeated interviews about repeated trauma from the distant past: A study of report consistency. In Applied Issues in Investigative Interviewing, Eyewitness Memory, and Credibility Assessment (Vol. 9781461455479, pp. 191–217). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free