Using formal concept analysis to discover patterns of non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines: A case study in the management of breast cancer

9Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) may be appropriate tools to promote the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). However, compliance with CPGs is a multifactorial process that relies on the CPGs to be implemented, the physician(s) in charge of the decision, and the patient to manage. Formal concept analysis (FCA) allows to derive implicit relationships from a set of objects described by their attributes, based on the principle of attribute sharing between objects. We used FCA to elicit patient-based formal concepts related to the non-conformity of multidisciplinary staff meetings (MSMs) decisions with CPGs in the domain of breast cancer management. We developed a strategy for selecting attributes and make lattices manageable. We found that when not using the guideline-based CDSS OncoDoc2, patients with bad prognostic factors were associated with non-compliant decisions. This was corrected when the system was used during MSMs. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Messai, N., Bouaud, J., Aufaure, M. A., Zelek, L., & Séroussi, B. (2011). Using formal concept analysis to discover patterns of non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines: A case study in the management of breast cancer. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6747 LNAI, pp. 119–128). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22218-4_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free