Participation, housing, and the question of 'good architecture'

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Tallinn Architecture Biennale 'Recycling Socialism', held in September 2013, is reviewed in this paper. Key themes and contradictions that crystallised throughout the event are identified and analysed. Participatory approach and its shortcomings are discussed in relation to the Biennale's vision competition winning entry. What is the dual legacy of socialism and modernism for architectural and urban practices? The question is studied via the contrasting practices of raumlabor and DOGMA, two key participants in the Biennale's events. Whereas participation is a goal and an answer to modernist-Fordist city in raumlabor's practice, for DOGMA it is the starting point for interrogating post-Fordist city.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krivý, M. (2013). Participation, housing, and the question of “good architecture.” Footprint. https://doi.org/10.59490/footprint.7.2.778

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free