Evaluating team performance at the edge of Chaos

17Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We introduce a concise approach to teamwork evaluation on multiple levels-dealing with agent's behaviour spread and multi-agent coordination potential, and abstracting away the team decision process. The presented quantitative information-theoretic methods measure behavioural and epistemic entropy, and detect phase transitions-The edge of chaos-in team performance. The techniques clearly identify under-performing states, where a change in tactics may be warranted. This approach is a step towards a unified quantitative framework on behavioural and belief dynamics in complex multi-agent systems.

References Powered by Scopus

Universality and complexity in cellular automata

1409Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Task decomposition, dynamic role assignment, and low-bandwidth communication for real-time strategic teamwork

327Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Classifying cellular automata automatically: Finding gliders, filtering, and relating space-time patterns, attractor basins, and the Z parameter

176Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evolving coordinated group behaviours through maximisation of mean mutual information

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defining and detecting emergence in complex networks

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying Long-Range Interactions and Coherent Structure in Multi-Agent Dynamics

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prokopenko, M., & Wang, P. (2004). Evaluating team performance at the edge of Chaos. In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 3020, pp. 89–101). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25940-4_8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Researcher 2

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

56%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

22%

Physics and Astronomy 1

11%

Engineering 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free