The research presented in this paper is part of an ongoing investigation into how best to support meaningful lab-based usability evaluations of mobile technologies. In particular, we report on a comparative study of (a) a standard paper prototype of a mobile application used to perform an early-phase seated (static) usability evaluation, and (b) a pseudo-paper prototype created from the paper prototype used to perform an early-phase, contextually-relevant, mobile usability evaluation. We draw some initial conclusions regarding whether it is worth the added effort of conducting a usability evaluation of a pseudo-paper prototype in a contextually-relevant setting during early-phase user interface development.
CITATION STYLE
Lumsden, J., & Maclean, R. (2008). A comparison of pseudo-paper and paper prototyping methods for mobile evaluations. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5333, pp. 538–547). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_77
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.