Urban Myths and Rural Legends: An Alternate Take on the Regionalism of Hip Hop

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The practices of hip-hop evolved during the mid-1970s in New York City’s dilapidated neighborhoods and are almost exclusively represented through the fabric of inner-city life. However, over the past forty years hip-hop has produced diverse regional-rural agendas within the core elements of the culture, reflected in its sound. By exploring hip-hop culture in the West Country, UK, this article locates hip-hop’s regional-rural origins to attest its productions evolve differently to that of metro-centric artists, coexisting as vehicles for negotiating socio-geographical acceptance and affirming a regional-rural identity. These alternate modes of practice enrichen the wider hip-hop community by developing relationships with traditional regional culture and producing new narratives to challenge hip-hop’s conventions.

References Powered by Scopus

The mobility imperative for rural youth: the structural, symbolic and non-representational dimensions rural youth mobilities

189Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

It Ain't Where You're From, It's Where You're At… The Dialectics of Diasporic Identification

162Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

'Represent': Race, space and place in rap music

137Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

“We Went from ‘Yes, Yes Yawl’, Tae ‘Who You Talkin Tae?’ ”: Language and Authenticity in Scots Hip Hop

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Rhetoric of (Re)marking at the Oscars: Performance of Place in Glory

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Paor-Evans, A. (2020). Urban Myths and Rural Legends: An Alternate Take on the Regionalism of Hip Hop. Popular Music and Society, 43(4), 414–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2020.1730651

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 3

60%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Linguistics 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 46

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free