Long-term visual, refractive and topographic outcomes of “epi-off” corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus: Standard versus accelerated protocol

13Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the visual, refractive and topographic outcomes of standard and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in pediatric keratoconus patients. Methods: Prospective, comparative observational study on 68 eyes of 35 pediatric kerato-conus patients (<18 years). Patients were classified into two groups, group (I) included 34 eyes and received standard “Epi-Off” CXL (3 mW/cm2, 30 min.) and group (II) included 34 eyes and received accelerated “Epi-Off” CXL (9 mW/cm2, 10 min.). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), simulated keratometry (Sim K-1, Sim K-2, K-max, K-mean), cylindrical (CYL), pachymetry and Q-value were evaluated preoperatively and for 3 years postoperatively. Results: Postoperative UDVA and CDVA did not significantly change in both groups after 3 years. Postoperative SE was increased significantly in accelerated CXL (p=0.012) with no significant change in the postoperative cylinder in both procedures. Standard CXL had greater “significant” effect in decreasing Sim K-1, K-max and K-mean. The mean reduction in postoperative corneal pachymetry (at thinnest location) was significant in standard CXL (18.4 μm) (p=0.001). No significant change was noticed in postoperative Q-value. Conclusion: Standard and accelerated CXL protocols are efficient in pediatric keratoconus management with better outcomes in the standard procedure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amer, I., Elaskary, A., Mostafa, A., Hazem, H. A., Omar, A., & Abdou, A. (2020). Long-term visual, refractive and topographic outcomes of “epi-off” corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus: Standard versus accelerated protocol. Clinical Ophthalmology, 14, 3747–3754. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S275797

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free