Accountability and Coalitions: Evidence from a Negotiation Experiment

11Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article tests the effect of accountability on negotiation outcomes in a face-to-face classroom experiment. Student participants were asked to form coalitions in groups of three. In the treatment condition, negotiators were held accountable by a personal forum during the formation of the coalition. In the control condition, negotiators were not held accountable. Results show that accountability leads to lower group performance in coalition negotiations. Accountability also reduced the willingness of negotiators to include all negotiators in a “grand coalition.” Rather, accountable negotiators reached agreement with a subset of negotiators. Accountability increased the odds of reaching no agreement. These findings challenge the idea of increased performance as a result of public accountability in the context of coalition negotiations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouwman, R., van Thiel, S., van Deemen, A., & Rouwette, E. (2018). Accountability and Coalitions: Evidence from a Negotiation Experiment. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12858

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free