The affective impact of financial skewness on neural activity and choice

45Citations
Citations of this article
106Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Few finance theories consider the influence of "skewness" (or large and asymmetric but unlikely outcomes) on financial choice. We investigated the impact of skewed gambles on subjects' neural activity, self-reported affective responses, and subsequent preferences using functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI). Neurally, skewed gambles elicited more anterior insula activation than symmetric gambles equated for expected value and variance, and positively skewed gambles also specifically elicited more nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activation than negatively skewed gambles. Affectively, positively skewed gambles elicited more positive arousal and negatively skewed gambles elicited more negative arousal than symmetric gambles equated for expected value and variance. Subjects also preferred positively skewed gambles more, but negatively skewed gambles less than symmetric gambles of equal expected value. Individual differences in both NAcc activity and positive arousal predicted preferences for positively skewed gambles. These findings support an anticipatory affect account in which statistical properties of gambles-including skewness-can influence neural activity, affective responses, and ultimately, choice. © 2011 Wu et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, C. C., Bossaerts, P., & Knutson, B. (2011). The affective impact of financial skewness on neural activity and choice. PLoS ONE, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016838

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free