Occlusal dysesthesia and its impact on daily practice

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 1976, Marbach first described in the literature a clinical entity that he called “the phantom bite,” now known as “occlusal dysesthesia” (OD). Most patients suffering from OD are going through an unusually stressful period in their lives and have undergone dental therapy at the same time, resulting in a mental fixation on their teeth. They perceive clinically unremarkable occlusal contacts as bothersome or uncomfortable and TMD is a common comorbidity. Although there is no apparent relationship between the clinical findings and the nature and severity of the reported occlusal complaints, patients search for their “ideal” occlusion or to regain their “lost bite.” As a result, they suffer from persistent and severe emotional distress. The co-occurrence of depression, anxiety and/or personality disorders is common. The primary therapeutic goal is to improve oral health-related quality of life. Occlusal adjustments are contraindicated. Instead, professional counseling and education as information therapy, psychological therapy, oral splints as a form of occlusal therapy with the goal of defocusing effects and medication are recommended forms of therapy. Unfortunately, the acceptance of the diagnosis of OD and the therapeutic recommendations is usually low among these patients and a large proportion reject therapeutic efforts out of conviction and continue their journey in search of “healing” invasive therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Türp, J. C., & Hellmann, D. (2024). Occlusal dysesthesia and its impact on daily practice. Seminars in Orthodontics, 30(3), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free