Rationalism Versus Subjective Experience: The Problem of the Two Minds in Spinoza

  • Malinowski-Charles S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Syliane Malinowski-Charles undertakes to clarify the ontological status of inadequate ideas and passive affects in Spinoza by questioning the identity of the subjects of which Spinoza speaks when referring to the subjective and objective realities of a mode. Against the surprisingly widespread view which holds that for Spinoza, inadequate ideas and passive affects are “nothing,” she argues that they must have a share in Deus sive Natura and shows how our subjective, physchological mind is intrinsically related to the logical, abstract one in God’s intellect, of which it is a “part.”

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malinowski-Charles, S. (2010). Rationalism Versus Subjective Experience: The Problem of the Two Minds in Spinoza. In The Rationalists: Between Tradition and Innovation (pp. 123–143). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9385-1_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free