Effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality in low radiation dose chest CT: A phantom study

11Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the quality of chest computed tomography (CT) images obtained with low-dose CT using three iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. METHODS Two 64-detector spiral CT scanners (HDCT and iCT) were used to scan a chest phantom containing 6 ground-glass nodules (GGNs) at 11 radiation dose levels. CT images were reconstructed by filtered back projection or three IR algorithms. Reconstructed images were analyzed for CT values, average noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values, subjective image noise, and diagnostic acceptability of the GGNs. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS Average noise decreased and CNR increased with increasing radiation dose when the same reconstruction algorithm was applied. Average image noise was significantly lower when reconstructed with MBIR than with iDOSE4 at the same low radiation doses. The two radiologists showed good interobserver consistency in image quality with kappa 0.83. A significant relationship was found between image noise and diagnostic acceptability of the GGNs. CONCLUSION Three IR algorithms are able to reduce the image noise and improve the image quality of low-dose CT. In the same radiation dose, the low-dose CT image quality reconstructed with MBIR algorithms is better than that of other IR algorithms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, Y., Zhang, T. T., Hu, Z. H., Li, J., Hou, H. J., Xu, Z. S., & He, W. (2019). Effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality in low radiation dose chest CT: A phantom study. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 25(6), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2019.18539

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free