Extending Iterative Protein Redesign and Optimization (IPRO) in protein library design for ligand specificity

25Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article we extend the Iterative Protein Redesign and Optimization (IPRO) framework for the design of protein libraries with targeted ligand specificity. Mutations that minimize the binding energy with the desired ligand are identified. At the same time explicit constraints are introduced that maintain the binding energy for all decoy ligands above a threshold necessary for successful binding. The proposed framework is demonstrated by computationally altering the effector binding specificity of the bacterial transcriptional regulatory protein AraC, belonging to the AraC/XylS family of transcriptional regulators for different unnatural ligands. The obtained results demonstrate the importance of systematically suppressing the binding energy for competing ligands. Pinpointing a small set of mutations within the binding pocket greatly improves the difference in binding energies between targeted and decoy ligands, even when they are very similar. © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
125Citations
156Readers
Get full text
99Citations
397Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fazelinia, H., Cirino, P. C., & Maranas, C. D. (2007). Extending Iterative Protein Redesign and Optimization (IPRO) in protein library design for ligand specificity. Biophysical Journal, 92(6), 2120–2130. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.096016

Readers over time

‘09‘11‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

59%

Researcher 14

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20

48%

Engineering 12

29%

Chemistry 5

12%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0