A Rockburst Proneness Evaluation Method Based on Multidimensional Cloud Model Improved by Control Variable Method and Rockburst Database

10Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Rockbursts are common geological disasters in underground engineering, and rockburst proneness evaluation is an important research subject. In this study, a multidimensional cloud model was used to evaluate the rockburst proneness level, and the control variable method was used to establish 15 multidimensional cloud (MC) models. The key factors affecting the accuracy of multidimensional cloud model evaluation are numerical characteristics, weight, and normalization methods. The optimal numerical characteristics calculation method of a multidimensional cloud model was determined, and an improved CRITIC (IC) weight method was optimised by introducing the relative standard deviation and an improved quantisation coefficient. Six rockburst indexes were used as input for the multidimensional cloud model, including the elastic deformation energy index Wet, maximum tangential stress σθ(MPa) of a cavern, uniaxial compressive strength σc(MPa), uniaxial tensile strength στ(MPa), strength brittleness coefficient B1 = σc/στ, and stress coefficient σθ/σc. The model was used to learn 271 groups of complete rockburst cases, and the MC-IC rockburst proneness evaluation method was established. The performance of the proposed MC-IC rockburst proneness method was verified by an 8-fold cross-validation and confusion matrix (precision, recall, F1). The method was tested to evaluate 20 groups of rockburst cases from the Jiangbian Hydropower Station, and the accuracy reaches 95%. The evaluation results were compared with three empirical criteria: four cloud-based methods, three unsupervised learning methods, and four supervised learning methods; the accuracy of the method established in this paper is 93.33%. The results showed that the MC-IC method had an excellent performance in evaluating rockburst proneness and can provide a practical basis for identifying rockburst hazard areas in deep engineering.

References Powered by Scopus

Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method

2005Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The 2003 Canadian geotechnical colloquium: Mechanistic interpretation and practical application of damage and spalling prediction criteria for deep tunnelling

630Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Classification of rockburst in underground projects: Comparison of ten supervised learning methods

394Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Short-term rockburst prediction in underground project: insights from an explainable and interpretable ensemble learning model

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of the Rock Burst Intensity of a Cloud Model Based on the CRITIC Method and the Order Relation Analysis Method

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Product design evaluation based on improved CRITIC and Comprehensive Cloud-TOPSIS – Applied to automotive styling design evaluation

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, J., Liu, P., Ma, L., & He, M. (2022). A Rockburst Proneness Evaluation Method Based on Multidimensional Cloud Model Improved by Control Variable Method and Rockburst Database. Lithosphere, 2022(Special Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.2113/2022/5354402

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

40%

Design 1

20%

Decision Sciences 1

20%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free