The excitation of equatorial waves by deep convection in the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3)

77Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The forcing of equatorial waves by convective heating in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model (CCM3) is investigated and compared with the forcing deduced from observations of convective clouds. The analysis is performed on two different simulations, wherein convection is represented by the Zhang-McFarlane and the Hack parameterization schemes, respectively. Spectra of equatorial waves excited by convective heating (Rossby, Kelvin, and gravity waves) are obtained by projecting the heating field onto Hough modes; the dynamical response to the heating is then calculated in terms of the vertical component of the Eliassen-Palm flux, Fz, focusing on waves that are able to propagate into the middle atmosphere. The same analysis is repeated using observations of outgoing longwave radiation as a proxy for tropical convection. Comparison of CCM3 results with those derived from observations indicates that high-frequency heating variability is underestimated in both CCM3 simulations, despite the fact that time-mean values of convective heating are well represented. Moreover, the two convective parameterization schemes differ substantially from each other: Compared to observations, Fz is severely underestimated at most frequencies when CCM3 is run with the Zhang-McFarlane scheme. When the Hack scheme is used, Fz at frequencies |ω| < 0.5 cycles per day is comparable to the observations, but it is underestimated at higher frequencies. Misrepresentation of the variability of convective heating is likely to have important consequences for the dynamical simulation of the middle atmosphere and even the troposphere.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ricciardulli, L., & Garcia, R. R. (2000). The excitation of equatorial waves by deep convection in the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3). Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 57(21), 3461–3487. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<3461:TEOEWB>2.0.CO;2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free