Paraconsistent reasoning via quantified Boolean formulas, I: Axiomatising signed systems

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Signed systems were introduced as a general, syntax-independent framework for paraconsistent reasoning, that is, non-trivialised reasoning from inconsistent information. In this paper, we show how the family of corresponding paraconsistent consequence relations can be axiomatised by means of quantified Boolean formulas. This approach has several benefits. First, it furnishes an axiomatic specification of paraconsistent reasoning within the framework of signed systems. Second, this axiomatisation allows us to identify upper bounds for the complexity of the different signed consequence relations. We strengthen these upper bounds by providing strict complexity results for the considered reasoning tasks. Finally, we obtain an implementation of different forms of paraconsistent reasoning by appeal to the existing system QUIP. © 2002 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Besnard, P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2002). Paraconsistent reasoning via quantified Boolean formulas, I: Axiomatising signed systems. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2424 LNAI, pp. 320–331). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free