The role of monotonicity in the epistemic analysis of strategic games

11Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is well-known that in finite strategic games true common belief (or common knowledge) of rationality implies that the players will choose only strategies that survive the iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies. We establish a general theorem that deals with monotonic rationality notions and arbitrary strategic games and allows to strengthen the above result to arbitrary games, other rationality notions, and transfinite iterations of the elimination process. We also clarify what conclusions one can draw for the customary dominance notions that are not monotonic. The main tool is Tarski's Fixpoint Theorem. © 2010 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Switzerland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Apt, K. R., & Zvesper, J. A. (2010). The role of monotonicity in the epistemic analysis of strategic games. Games, 1(4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.3390/g1040381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free