Value-based evidence across health care sectors: a push for transparent real-world studies, data, and evidence dissemination

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is currently a heightened need for transparency in pharmaceutical sectors. The inclusion of real-world (RW) evidence, in addition to clinical trial evidence, in decision-making processes, was an important step forward toward a more inclusive established value proposition. This advance has introduced new transparency challenges. Increasing transparency is a critical step toward accelerating improvement in type, quality, and access to data, regardless of whether these originate from clinical trials or from RW studies. However, so far, advances in transparency have been relatively restricted to clinical trials, and there remains a lack of similar expectations or standards of transparency concerning the generation and reporting of RW data. This perspective paper aims to highlight the need for transparency concerning RW studies, data, and evidence across health care sectors, to identify areas for improvement, and provide concrete recommendations and practices for the future. Specific issues are discussed from different stakeholder perspectives, culminating in recommended actions, from individual stakeholder perspectives, for improved RW study, data, and evidence transparency. Furthermore, a list of potential guidelines for consideration by stakeholders is proposed. While recommendations from different stakeholder perspectives are made, true transparency in the processes involved in the generation, reporting, and use of RW evidence will require a concerted effort from all stakeholders across health care sectors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Den Broek, R. W. M., Matheis, R. J., Bright, J. L., Hartog, T. E., & Perfetto, E. M. (2022). Value-based evidence across health care sectors: a push for transparent real-world studies, data, and evidence dissemination. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 17(4), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133122000056

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free