Revisiting the plasticity of human spatial cognition

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In a recent study by Haun et al. (2011), Dutch-speaking children who prefer an egocentric (left/right) reference frame when describing spatial relationships, and Haillom-speaking children who use a geocentric (north/south) frame were found to vary in their capacity to memorize small-scale arrays using their language-incongruent system. In two experiments, we reconcile these results with previous findings by Li et al. (2011) which showed that English (egocentric) and Tseltal Mayan (geocentric) speakers can flexibly use both systems. In Experiment 1, attempting to replicate Haun et al., we found that English- but not Tseltal-speaking children could use their language-incongruent system. In Experiment 2, we demonstrate that Tseltal children can use an egocentric system when instructed nonverbally without left/right language. We argue that Haun et al.'s results are due to the Haillom children's lack of understanding of left/right instructions and that task constraints determine which system is easier to use. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abarbanell, L., Montana, R., & Li, P. (2011). Revisiting the plasticity of human spatial cognition. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6899 LNCS, pp. 245–263). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23196-4_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free