Algebraic correction methods for computational assessment of clone overlaps in DNA fingerprint mapping

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The Sulston score is a well-established, though approximate metric for probabilistically evaluating postulated clone overlaps in DNA fingerprint mapping. It is known to systematically over-predict match probabilities by various orders of magnitude, depending upon project-specific parameters. Although the exact probability distribution is also available for the comparison problem, it is rather difficult to compute and cannot be used directly in most cases. A methodology providing both improved accuracy and computational economy is required. Results: We propose a straightforward algebraic correction procedure, which takes the Sulston score as a provisional value and applies a power-law equation to obtain an improved result. Numerical comparisons indicate dramatically increased accuracy over the range of parameters typical of traditional agarose fingerprint mapping. Issues with extrapolating the method into parameter ranges characteristic of newer capillary electrophoresis-based projects are also discussed. Conclusion: Although only marginally more expensive to compute than the raw Sulston score, the correction provides a vastly improved probabilistic description of hypothesized clone overlaps. This will clearly be important in overlap assessment and perhaps for other tasks as well, for example in using the ranking of overlap probabilities to assist in clone ordering. © 2007 Wendl; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wendl, M. C. (2007). Algebraic correction methods for computational assessment of clone overlaps in DNA fingerprint mapping. BMC Bioinformatics, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-127

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free