Ethnic identity and the anthropological relevance of archaeology

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With reference to the work of the prehistorian Vere Gordon Childe, this chapter discusses how the practise of archaeology takes place in a politicized context. The chapter focuses in particular on contemporary nationalist distortions or abuses of the archaeological record and on archaeology's relevance and responsibility for combating these abuses. Ethically responsible archaeologists are shown to have both a negative and positive role to play. Minimally, archaeologists, particularly those working abroad, must understand the political implications of their own and their colleagues' works. If they do not so contextualize their research, they run the risk of their discoveries being used for questionable political purposes. They have the additional responsibility of debunking unsustainable claims or dubious identifications based on ethnically moot material remains.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kohl, P. L. (2012). Ethnic identity and the anthropological relevance of archaeology. In Archaeology in Society: Its Relevance in the Modern World (Vol. 9781441998811, pp. 229–236). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9881-1_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free